Disposed

Rasik Lall Gupta v. Manik Lal Gupta and Ors.

Patna HC30 Jan 2019C. REV./452/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Civil review filed seeking clerical correction of court order regarding description of cause of action in related civil miscellaneous matter. Court ordered deletion of specific erroneous text and modified the record by reading correct description of the suit claim. Disposed of with aforesaid modification.

What did the court decide?

Deleted specific text in impugned order and read the said order as corrected part of earlier order dated 06.09.2018.

Rasik Lall Gupta Vs Manik Lal Gupta and Ors. — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Review No.452 of 2018 In

¶2

CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION No.304 of 2018

¶3

====================================================== Rasik Lall Gupta

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s Versus Manik Lall Gupta and Ors ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Abhay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶5

3 30-01-2019

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶7

This civil review petition is filed for

¶8

review/modification of order dated 06.09.2018 passed in Civil Miscellaneous No.304 of 2018 which was dismissed as devoid of merit.

¶9

Mr. Abhay Kumar Singh, senior counsel for the petitioner, submits that in the 3^rd paragraph of order dated 06.09.2018 it has been typed as “Manik Lall Gupta filed the suit for partition of the ancestral and self-acquired property, moveable and immoveable of his father, Late Panna Lall”, in fact, Manik Lall Gupta filed the suit claiming half share in the company’s shares of S.B.I. and I.T.C. purchased by his father.

¶10

In this view of the fact, instead of “suit for partition of the ancestral and self-acquired property, moveable and

¶11

Patna High Court C. REV. No.452 of 2018(3) dt.30-01-2019 2/2

¶12

immoveable of his father, Late Panna Lall”, it should be read as “suit claiming half share in the company’s shares of S.B.I. and I.T.C. purchased by his father”.

¶13

Learned senior counsel for the petitioner also submits that in para 4 of the said order, the words ‘ancestral and selfacquired property of Panna Lall’ be also deleted. Let the same be deleted.

¶14

Thus, the said order stands corrected. Let this order be read as part of the order dated 06.09.2018 passed in Civil Miscellaneous No.304 of 2018.

¶15

Accordingly, this civil review petition is disposed of with the aforesaid modification.

¶16

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶17

Harish/-

¶18

Rasik Lall Gupta v. Manik Lal Gupta and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rasik Lall Gupta v. Manik Lal Gupta and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Fantush Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Amit Kumar @ Amit Chaursiya Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Bijay Kumar Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Basanti Devi Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Braj Kishore Singh Chouhan Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Laxmi Mahto and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar Through The Collector, Madhubani and Ors.