Allowed

Amit Kumar @ Amit Chaursiya v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC29 Jan 2019CR. MISC./59730/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a complaint regarding alleged cheating for providing a job, the Patna High Court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner, conditioned upon his surrender and furnishing a bail bond with sureties under Section 438 Cr.P.C. within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be enlarged on bail upon surrender and furnishing of bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of like amount within four weeks.

Amit Kumar @ Amit Chaursiya Vs State Of Bihar and Anr. — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.59730 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1022 Year-2017 Thana- BHOJPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- Bhojpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Amit Kumar @ Amit Chaursiya, S/o Sachita Nand Chaurasiya @ Sonchu Chaurasiya, Resident of Village- Mahesh Khuit, Bichili Tola, P.S. Khagariya, District- Khagariya.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar.

¶8

Chandan Kumar Singh, Son of Nand Kumar Singh, Resident of Moaap Kala, P.S. Imadpur, District Bhojpur. A/P Mahuli Kothi (Near Ravi Baba), P.S. Ara Nawada, District Bhojpur.

¶9

... ... Opposite Parties

¶10

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Amit Upadhyay For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sri Bhanu Pratap Singh ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶12

5 29-01-2019 Heard both sides.

¶13

Petitioner apprehends his arrest in Complaint Case No.1022(C) of 2017 for the offences allegedly committed by the petitioner under Sections 420, 120(B) and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

The gist of the allegation is that the petitioner and Ravi Kumar Chaurasiya took Rs.1,00,000/- from the complainant, Chandan Kumar Singh for providing him job in IVth Grade in Indian Railway but the petitioner did not provide job to the complainant.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner did not execute any agreement nor received any

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.59730 of 2018(5) dt.29-01-2019 2/2

¶17

amount from the complainant.

¶18

Learned counsel for the complainant however, vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

¶19

Having considered the facts that the petitioner has denied to have received any amount from the complainant on the pretext of providing him job or to execute any deed of agreement, let petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of this order be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-VIII, Bhojpur, Ara in connection with Complaint Case No.1022(C) of 2017, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶20

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶21

S.KUMAR/-

¶22

U T

Amit Kumar @ Amit Chaursiya v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Amit Kumar @ Amit Chaursiya v. State Of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Yashoda Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Rakesh Kumar Ghalaut Vs The State Of Bihar

Sanjay Sao and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Fantush Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Bijay Kumar Singh and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Khudbuddin Ansari and Ors. Vs The State of Bihar