Dismissed

Unichem Laboratories Ltd. Through Its Managing Director and Anr. v. Union Of India and Ors.

Patna HC2 Jul 2019CWJC/7963/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Patna dismissed the writ petition of Unichem Laboratories Ltd. as withdrawn with liberty to file an appeal, granting a 30-day stay from coercive action pending the appeal.

What did the court decide?

The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file an appeal within 30 days; coercive action stayed for 30 days.

Unichem Laboratories Ltd. Through Its Managing… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7963 of 2018

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Unichem Laboratories Ltd. Through its Managing Director, Unichem Bhawan, Prabhat Estate S.V. Road Jogeshwari (West) Mumbai-400102.

¶4

Mr. Santoush Kadam DGM-HR and ER of company registered office, Unichem Bhawan, Prabhat Estate S.V. Road Jogeshwari (West) Mumbai400102.

¶5

... ... Petitioners

¶6

Versus

¶7

Union Of India through Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Patna, Maurya Lok Complex 2^nd Floor, A-Block, Room No.17, Patna.

¶8

Assistant Labour commissioner (Central), Patna, Maurya Lok Complex 2^nd Floor, A- Block, Room No. 17, Patna.

¶9

Prashant Kumar Mishra, S/o Sri Bindeshwar Mishra, C- 301 Raunak Capital Green, Behind Hitech Hospital, R.K. Puram Road, P.O. P.S.- Danapur, District- Patna.

¶10

... ... Respondents

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dr. U.S. Prasad, Advocate Mr. Dr. Anshuman, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.D Sanjay Addl. Soc. Gen. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY

¶12

ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 02-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

¶14

In the present case, the petitioners are challenging the order of the Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central), Patna as well as the order of the Controlling Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioners fairly accepted that the petitioners have not exhausted the alternative remedy of appeal and seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with

¶16

Patna High Court CWJC No.7963 of 2018(2) dt.02-07-2019 2/2

¶17

a liberty to file appeal before the Appellate Authority.

¶18

In such view of the matter, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. If the petitioners file an appeal before the Appellate Authority within a period of 30 days from today, he will be at liberty to make a prayer for stay of the impugned orders. While deciding the issue of limitation, the Appellate Authority will consider the pendency of this case before this Court. The respondents authority will not take any coercive action against the petitioners within 30 days from today.

¶19

(Shivaji Pandey, J)

¶20

pawan/-

¶21

Unichem Laboratories Ltd. Through Its Managing Director and Anr. v. Union Of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Unichem Laboratories Ltd. Through Its Managing Director and Anr. v. Union Of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Kumar Singh Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Somnath Mahto @ Shobh Nath Mahto Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Upendra Mishra Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rajni Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Yogendra Prasad, Vs The Union of India, Ministry of Labour, through its secretary

Nanhak Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar