Disposed

Yogendra Prasad, v. The Union of India, Ministry of Labour, through its secretary

Patna HC2 Jul 2019CWJC/13260/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted liberty to the petitioner not to face coercive action for two weeks to appear before the authority. The court explicitly stated it would not express an opinion on the merits of the application, pending representation. The order was disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Liberty granted to petitioner to take plea before authority within two weeks without coercive action.

Yogendra Prasad, Vs The Union of India, Ministry of… — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13260 of 2019

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Yogendra Prasad, S/o Late Indrasan Prasad, resident of Plot No. 58, PocketP-4, N.H.P.C. Society, Near Jalvayu Vihar Apartment Builders Area, Greater Noida, Kasana, P.O. and P.S. and District- Gautam Budha Nagar (U.P.)201310.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The Union of India, Ministry of Labour, through its Secretary, New Delhi.

¶7

The Employees Provident Fund Organisation, Sub-Regional Office, Lakshmi Chowk, Muzaffarpur represented through its Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-II, E.P.F.O., Sub-Regional Office, Lakshmi Chowk, Muzaffarpur.

¶8

The Regional Provident Fund Commissioner-II, Employees Provident Fund Organisation, Sub- Regional Office, Lakshmi Chowk, Muzaffarpur.

¶9

The Assessing Officer, Employees Provident Fund Organisation, SubRegional Office, Lakshmi Chowk, Muzaffarpur.

¶10

... ... Respondent/s

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Shri Prakash Srivastava, Adv. Mr. Shyam Kishor Das, Adv. Mr. Anu Priyadarshi, Adv. For the U.O.I : Mr. S. D. Sanjay (ADSG) For the E.P.F.O. : Mr.Ram Shankar Pradhan, Sr. Adv. ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 02-07-2019

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ram Shankar Pradhan, Senior counsel appearing on behalf of the E.P.F.O.

¶15

In this case, the petitioner has made a limited prayer for restraining the police to take coercive action against the petitioner in securing his presence.

¶16

The counsel for the petitioner submits that he himself would appear before the authority concerned within two weeks.

¶17

Patna High Court CWJC No.13260 of 2019(2) dt.02-07-2019 2/2

¶18

In view of the statement made at the Bar and whatever the petitioner likes to take plea, he will have liberty to take plea before the authority concerned, as has been stated that the petitioner was not a member of Board of Director which will be considered by the authority concerned, who will take a decision in accordance with law.

¶19

Let no coercive action be taken against the petitioner for two weeks.

¶20

This Court is not giving any opinion on the merit of the case. However, if the petitioner fails to appear before the authority concerned within the aforesaid period, in such circumstance, the coercive order passed against the petitioner will come in operation and police will act in accordance with law.

¶21

With the above observation and direction, this application is disposed of.

¶22

(Shivaji Pandey, J)

¶23

Mahesh/-

¶24

Yogendra Prasad, v. The Union of India, Ministry of Labour, through its secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yogendra Prasad, v. The Union of India, Ministry of Labour, through its secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manoj Kumar Singh Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Somnath Mahto @ Shobh Nath Mahto Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Upendra Mishra Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rajni Devi Vs The State of Bihar

Unichem Laboratories Ltd. Through Its Managing Director and Anr. Vs Union Of India and Ors.

Nanhak Chaudhary Vs The State of Bihar