This order dismisses a writ petition sub judice as infructuous on the ground that the petitioner died during the pendency of the application.
Application dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4699 of 2018
======================================================
Manoj Kumar Singh
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The Union Of India and Ors
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mrs.Archana Sinha @ Archana Shahi ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER
2 01-07-2019 Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner
has already died during the pendency of this application, as such, this application has become infructuous.
Accordingly, this application is dismissed as
infructuous.
(Shivaji Pandey, J)
V.K.Pandey/-
U
Manoj Kumar Singh
The Union Of India
Shivaji Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
