Allowed

Sanju Devi and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC3 Jul 2019CWJC/3612/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court allowed withdrawal of writ application regarding arbitration award as alternative remedy exists under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Stay of operation granted pending filing of Section 34 application.

What did the court decide?

Permission to withdraw Writ Application granted with liberty to pursue remedy under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996; stay of operation pending such application.

Sanju Devi and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Arbitration | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3612 of 2019

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Sanju Devi aged about 43 years, Female, W/o Pammo Yadav Resident of Village-Kumrath,P.O Simariya,P.S. Kajraili,Dist.-Bhagalpur

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

¶7

Mahendra and Mahendra Financial Services Ltd. Registered Office at Gateway Building, Appolo Bunder, Mumbai-400001 and its Corporate Office at Second Floor, Sadhana House, Behind Mahendra Towers 570, P.B. Marg, Worly, Mumbai-400018

¶8

Branch Manager, Mahendra and Mahendra Financial Services Ltd.,Tilkamanjhi, Bhagalpur.

¶9

Mr. Usha Sirsath(Bhise), Sole Arbitrator, Office Address at C/o G.J. Sirsath, 3 Om Shanti Housing Society, Jai Bhawaninagar, N-4, Mukundwali Railway Station Road, Aurangabad-431003(Maharashta).

¶10

... ... Respondents

¶11

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Dhirendra Nath Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr.Smt.Anuraha Singh (Sc21) ======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶13

2 03-07-2019 Having realized that the petitioner has a remedy

¶14

available for setting aside the arbitration award in accordance with Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Writ Application with liberty to pursue her remedy against the impugned award in accordance with law.

¶15

Permission is granted.

¶16

If any such application for setting aside of the

¶17

Patna High Court CWJC No.3612 of 2019(2) dt.03-07-2019 2/2

¶18

impugned award is filed before the appropriate court and in case a question of limitation arises the same will be considered keeping in mind that petitioner was pursuing her remedy before this court.

¶19

This Writ Application stands disposed of as withdrawn.

¶20

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)

¶21

Rajeev/-

¶22

Sanju Devi and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanju Devi and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dr. Lal Babu Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sangita Devi Vs The Union of India

Pushpa Devi Vs The State Election Commission and Ors.

Bijay Kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rabindra Kumar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Vivashwan Educational and Welfare Society Vs The State Bank of India Through Assistant General Manager and Ors.