The High Court at Patna allowed the warrantless withdrawal of a writ application by the petitioner who failed to appear, dismissing the application accordingly.
Permission granted to withdraw the writ application; application dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10681 of 2018
======================================================
Pushpa Devi W/o Ravi Kumar R/o Ward No.8, Nokha Nagar Panchayat, P.OP.S.- Nokha, District- Rohtas
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None For the State : Mr. S.K. Mandal, SC-3 Mr. Arjun Prasad, AC to SC-3 For the Commission : Mr. Sanjeev Nikesh, Adv.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER
2 02-07-2019 No one appears for the petitioner. However, learned counsel for the State as well as State Election Commission are present.
This case has come up under the heading “To Be Mentioned” on the mention slip filed on behalf of the petitioner seeking permission to withdraw this writ application.
Permission is granted.
This writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.
arvind/-
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
U
Pushpa Devi
The State Election Commission, Bihar
The Election Commissioner, State Election Commission
The Secretary, State Election Commission
The District Magistrate, Rohtas
The Land Reforms Deputy Collector, Sasaram
Rajeev Ranjan Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
