Disposed
Sangita Devi v. The Union of India
Patna HCCWJC/7046/2019
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The single judge allowed the petitioners to withdraw the writ application with liberty to approach the appropriate court, disposing of the matter as prayed.
What did the court decide?
Permission to withdraw the writ application with liberty to pursue the remedy if any available to the petitioner.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7046 of 2019
¶2
======================================================
¶3
- Sangita Devi W/o Pawan Kumar Singh, Proprietor of M/S Kishlay Detergent Powder Industries, Resident of Holding No- 106, South, Vir Kunwar Singh Colony, Pokhar Mohalla, P.O. - P.S.- Hajipur, District- Vaishali-844101.
¶4
- Pawan Kumar Singh S/o Late Ramjee Pd. Singh, Resident of Holding No106, South, Vir Kunwar Singh Colony, Pokhar Mohalla, P.O. - P.S.- Hajipur, District- Vaishali-844101.
¶5
... ... Petitioners
¶6
Versus
¶7
- The Union of India through the Secretary, Finance Department, Government of India, New Delhi.
¶8
- Punjab National Bank, through its Zonal Manager, Punjab National Bank, Zonal Office, Near R. Block, Patna.(Bihar)
¶9
- The Zonal Manager, Punjab National Bank, Zonal Office, Near R. Block, Patna (Bihar)
¶10
- The Chief Manager, Punjab National Bank, Hajipur Branch Office, at Vaishali.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Sangita Devi
- petitioner
Pawan Kumar Singh
- respondent
The Union of India
- respondent
Punjab National Bank
- respondent
The District Industries Center Govt. of Bihar
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court