Allowed

Manju Kumari v. the State of Bihar through Vigilance, Patna

Patna HC3 Jul 2019CR. MISC./9388/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in Special Case No. 51A of 2018 registered under IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act. The petitioner was apprehended to be arrested despite no recovery of evidence and implicating solely on co-accused statement. Court ordered bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount to Special Judge, Vigilance, Patna within four weeks.

Manju Kumari Vs the State of Bihar through Vigilance, Patna — Quashing and FIR | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9388 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-26 Year-2018 Thana- MAIGRA District- Gaya

¶3

====================================================== MANJU KUMARI Wife of Saroj Das Resident of Village - Khapriyawan, Kathansandi

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH VIGILANCE, PATNA Bihar

¶7

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Bhardwaj For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anjani Kumar (L.O.,I/C Vig.) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶9

5 03-07-2019

¶10

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶11

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Special Case No. 51A of 2018 registered under Sections 420/384/34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 7/8/9/13(i)(d) read with 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act.

¶12

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the case. Nothing has been recovered from the possession of this petitioner. Further submission is that only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused, petitioner has been made accused in the present case.

¶13

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9388 of 2019(5) dt.03-07-2019 2/2

¶15

case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Special Judge, VigilanceI, Patna in connection with Special Case No.51A of 2018 arising out of Maigra P.S. Case No. 26 of 2018, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr. P.C.

¶16

(Arvind Srivastava, J)

¶17

shailendra/-

¶18

U T

Manju Kumari v. the State of Bihar through Vigilance, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Manju Kumari v. the State of Bihar through Vigilance, Patna

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shabana Parween Vs the State of Bihar

Hari Shankar Prasad Vs The State of Bihar

Pankaj Kumar Ishwar @ Pankaj Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kamlesh Ray and Anr. Vs The State of Bihar and Anr.

Surendra Sah Vs The State of Bihar

Ritik Rajbanshi Vs The State of Bihar