Pankaj Kumar Ishwar @ Pankaj Kumar v. The State of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
The Patna High Court rejected the anticipatory bail application of two petitioners implicated in an FIR alleging offences under various sections of the IPC, including rape and criminal intimidation. The Court held the petitioners did not deserve bail due to serious allegations and specific material available on record.
What did the court decide?
Prayer for anticipatory bail rejected; petitioners denied the privilege of anticipatory bail.
What the court decided
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.36384 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-159 Year-2018 Thana- SARAI RANJAN District- Samastipur
======================================================
- PANKAJ KUMAR ISHWAR @ PANKAJ KUMAR Son of Maheshwar Ishwar Resident of Village- Sherpur Narsari, P.S.- Sarairanjan, DistrictSamastipur.
- Maheshwar Ishwar Son of Late Faudi Ishwar Resident of Village- Sherpur Narsari, P.S.- Sarairanjan, District- Samastipur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Pramod Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Uma Shankar Prasad Singh ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the petitioners are eligible for the grant of anticipatory bail.
Whether the allegations of assaulting women and racketeering necessitate rejection of bail.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Pankaj Kumar Ishwar @ Pankaj Kumar
- applicant
Maheshwar Ishwar
- respondent
The State of Bihar
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court