The petitioner withdrew the criminal miscellaneous application. The learned Single Judge permitted the withdrawal and disposed of the matter accordingly.
The application was permitted to be withdrawn and allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.80311 of 2019
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1098 Year-2017 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur
======================================================
VIVEK KUMAR GAUTAM @ VIVEK KUMAR
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anjani Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Brajendra Nath Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER
2 06-12-2019 Counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not
wish to pres this application.
The same is accordingly permitted to be withdrawn.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J)
s.hassan/-
U T
VIVEK KUMAR GAUTAM @ VIVEK KUMAR
The State of Bihar
MADHURESH PRASAD
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
