Allowed

Krishna Bihari Pandey v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC5 Dec 2019CR. MISC./64090/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court granted anticipatory bail to three petitioners facing charges under Sections 406/34 IPC and Section 138 NI Act. The order allowed bail in light of the payment of dues by the petitioners and imposed specific conditions regarding sureties and appearances.

What did the court decide?

Prayer for anticipatory bail allowed; petitioners to surrender within four weeks and furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- and two sureties.

Krishna Bihari Pandey Vs The State of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.64090 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-53 Year-2015 Thana- ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE DistrictRohtas

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Krishna Bihari Pandey son of Shree Kanhaiya Lal Pandit

¶5

Vinod Pandey son of shree Kanhaiya Lal Pandit

¶6

Kanhaiya Lal Pandit son of late Gangadayal Pandit, All are R/o village +P.O. Bhalunidham P.S. Dinara, Dist. Rohtas.

¶7

... ... Petitioner/s

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State of Bihar

¶10

Mithlesh Kumar Sinha son of late Ramchandra Chaudhary R/o vill+PO+PS Sanjhauli Dist. Rohtas.

¶11

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶12

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Nagendra Upadhyay For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Amit Kumar Rakesh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶13

3 05-12-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners,

¶14

complainant/opposite party No.2 and learned APP for the State. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with

¶15

Complaint Case No. 53 of 2015 (Tr. No.1254 of 2019) instituted for the offence under Section(s) 406/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 138 of the N.I. Act.

¶16

The counsel for the complainant/opposite party No.2 appears and submits that the amounts for which the case has been lodged has already been paid by the petitioners.

¶17

In view of such submission, prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.64090 of 2019(3) dt.05-12-2019 2/2

¶19

surrender/arrest of the petitioners, above named, before the court below, within four (04) weeks from today, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, 1^st Class, Bikramganj (Rohtas) in connection with Complaint Case No. 53 of 2015 (Tr. No.1254 of 2019) , subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P.C. subject to the following conditions:-

¶20

(i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioners who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioners. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioners.

¶21

(ii) That the petitioners will be well represented on each date and if they fail to do so on two consecutive dates, their bail bond will be liable to be cancelled.

¶22

(Madhuresh Prasad, J)

¶23

shyambihari/-

¶24

U T

Krishna Bihari Pandey v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishna Bihari Pandey v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Munna Yadav @ ayushman kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Sanjeet Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Kauleshwar Yadav @ Kouleshwar Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Bisheshwar Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Fantush Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Geeta Devi Vs The State of Bihar