Allowed

Md. Izarayal Ajjo v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC6 Dec 2019CR. MISC./57465/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Madhuresh Prasad J. allowed the petitioner's bail application in a case under Section 394 IPC. The court noted insufficient material linking the petitioner to the occurrence and ordered his release on behalf of Rs 10,000 with conditions.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail on furnishing of bonds of Rs 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each subject to conditions including remaining physically present in court and co-operating with investigation.

Md. Izarayal Ajjo Vs the State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57465 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-206 Year-2017 Thana- LAUKAHI District- Madhubani

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MD. IZARAYAL AJJO Son of Late Birkha Mian Resident of Village - Majhani, P.S. - Nirmali, District - Supaul

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ratanakar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Rabindra Kumar

¶11

======================================================

¶12

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶13

4 06-12-2019

¶14

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as

¶15

learned Addl. Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶16

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under section 394 of the IPC.

¶17

It is submitted by counsel for the petitioner that other than confessional statement of co-accused, there is nothing to link with the petitioner in the instant case. Petitioner has been made accused on account of criminal history and there is no material to connect him with the present occurrence still he is in custody since 22.04.2019.

¶18

Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

¶19

Considering the aforesaid submissions, prayer for bail

¶20

is allowed.

¶21

Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing

¶22

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57465 of 2019(4) dt.06-12-2019 2/2

¶23

bail bonds of Rs 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jhanjharapur in Laukahi P.S. Case no. 206/2017 subject to the following conditions.

¶24

(1) One of the bailors will be his own blood relative, preferably, mother, son, brother, sister and /or his wife.

¶25

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

¶26

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of court concerned.

¶27

(4) The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

¶28

(Madhuresh Prasad, J)

¶29

s.hassan/-

¶30

U T

Md. Izarayal Ajjo v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Izarayal Ajjo v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bisheshwar Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Krishna Bihari Pandey Vs The State of Bihar

Fantush Kumar Vs the State of Bihar

Vivek Kumar Gautam @ Vivek Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sufaida Khatoon Vs The State of Bihar

Ajay Rishideo @ Ajay Kumar Vs The State of Bihar