Allowed

Jugnu @ Vivek Patel v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC19 Feb 2019CR. MISC./80119/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an anticipatory bail petition under CrPC Section 438, the Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner accused of aiding in the recovery of foreign wine under Bihar Prohibition laws. The court directed a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner to be released on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of the like amount each.

Jugnu @ Vivek Patel Vs The State Of Bihar — Anticipatory Bail | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.80119 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-102 Year-2018 Thana- SANJHOLI District- Rohtas

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Jugnu @ Vivek Patel Son of Tes Lal Choudhary Resident of Village - Mathurapur, P.S.- Sanjhauli, District- Rohtas

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance :

¶10

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Ashok Kumar Pandey, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Sucheta Yadav, A.P.P. ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶12

3 19-02-2019 Heard the parties.

¶13

The petitioner seeks anticipatory bail in connection

¶14

with Sanjhauli P.S.Case No. 102 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 30 (a) and 32 (c) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

¶15

As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioner is of recovery of 48.600 liters of foreign wine, which were kept behind the bushes and accordingly seizure list has been prepared.

¶16

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case and nothing has been recovered from his possession and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶17

Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

¶18

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.80119 of 2018(3) dt.19-02-2019 2/2

¶19

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Sanjhauli P.S.Case No. 102 of 2018, to the satisfaction of learned Additioal Sessions Judge- II-cumSpecial Judge, Rohtas at Sasaram, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. with condition that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

¶20

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶21

sudha/-

¶22

U T

Jugnu @ Vivek Patel v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jugnu @ Vivek Patel v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kundan Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Mantu Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Vishu Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar

Deepak Sharma and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Kamleshwari Ram and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Jaykant Yadav @ Jaykant Rai Vs The State Of Bihar