Jaykant Yadav @ Jaykant Rai v. The State Of Bihar
Case brief
What is this about?
The criminal appeal was dismissed as withdrawn because the appellant was arrested during the pendency of the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Appeal (SJ) No.4624 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-296 Year-2018 Thana- BYPASS District- Patna
======================================================
Jaykant Yadav @ Jaykant Rai
... ... Appellant/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr.Jay Ram Prasad For the Respondent/s : Mr.Smt Usha Kumari No-1 ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER
3 19-02-2019 Heard the parties.
Submission of the learned counsel for the appelnlat is
that he has been arrested during the pendency of this appeal.
In such view of the matter, let this application be dismissed as withdrawn.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)
chn/-
U
Jaykant Yadav @ Jaykant Rai
The State Of Bihar
Vinod Kumar Sinha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court