Allowed

Deepak Sharma and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC19 Feb 2019CR. MISC./80062/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court allowed anticipatory bail to three petitioners in a mob violence case involving explosion of a bomb under Sections 326, 307/34 IPC and Explosive Substances Act on furnishing a bail bond.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties of the same amount each subject to conditions under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C.

Deepak Sharma and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.80062 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-223 Year-2018 Thana- MOUZAHIDPUR District- Bhagalpur

¶3

====================================================== 1.Deepak Sharma 2.Tinu Kumar 3. Raja Sah

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶8

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Swapnil Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Smt. Gulnar Begam ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 19-02-2019 Heard the parties.

¶11

The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in connection with Mojahidpur (Babbarganj) P.S.Case No. 223 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 326, 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3,4 and 5 of Explosive Substance Act.

¶12

As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioners is of explosion of bomb and when the police party proceeded towards the place of occurrence and found that blood was spread there and one person sustained injuries.

¶13

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioners and the informant himself stated in the written

¶14

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.80062 of 2018(3) dt.19-02-2019 2/2

¶15

complaint that no one had stated the name of petitioners rather he gathered the information from unknown persons and the petitioners are the student, who have not concern with the antecedent.It is further submitted that the petitioners have clean antecedents.

¶16

Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

¶17

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Mojahidpur (Babbargaj) P.S.Case No. 223 of 2018 to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Bhagalpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. with condition that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

¶18

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J.)

¶19

sudha/-

¶20

U T

Deepak Sharma and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Deepak Sharma and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kundan Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Mantu Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Vishu Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar

Kamleshwari Ram and Ors. Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Jaykant Yadav @ Jaykant Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Jugnu @ Vivek Patel Vs The State Of Bihar