Allowed

Md. Najo @ Najmul v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC9 Dec 2019CR. MISC./76162/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court allowed the bail application of the petitioner, who was in custody in a PS case involving offences under the IPC, Arms Act, and Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, upon furnishing bail bonds and complying with specific conditions including representation and address updates.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail with bonds of Rs. 10,000/- and two sureties of like amount, subject to conditions regarding representation and address.

Md. Najo @ Najmul Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.76162 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-334 Year-2018 Thana- MUNGER MUFFASIL District- Munger

¶3

======================================================

¶4

MD. NAJO @ NAJMUL Son of Late Md. Fakhruddin Resident of Mirzapur Bardah, Police Station, Muffasil, Distt - Munger.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Madhuri Kumari For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Pancha Nand Pandit ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER

¶11

3 09-12-2019

¶12

Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

¶13

Petitioner is in custody in Muffasil PS Case No. 334 of 2018 registered under Sections 121, 379, 424, 120B, 34 of the IPC and Sections 25(1-a), 25(1-aa), 25(1-b)a, 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act and Section 39 of Unlawful Activities Prevention Act.

¶14

It is submitted by petitioner’s Counsel that the petitioner was not named in the FIR and the name has surfaced in statement of co-accused Md. Gulan. The same has led no recovery from the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 27.3.2019. Petitioner was earlier accused Muffasil PS Case No. 15 of 2019 in which he is on bail.

¶15

Considering the aforesaid submissions prayer for bail of the petitioner is allowed.

¶16

Let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of CJM

¶17

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.76162 of 2019(3) dt.09-12-2019 2/2

¶18

Munger in Muffasil PS Case No. 334 of 2018 subject to the following conditions:-

¶19

(I) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the petitioner.

¶20

(ii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date in the trial and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to the cancelled.

¶21

(Madhuresh Prasad, J)

¶22

SNkumar/-

¶23

U T

Md. Najo @ Najmul v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Najo @ Najmul v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Izarayal Ajjo Vs the State of Bihar

Vivek Kumar Gautam @ Vivek Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Sufaida Khatoon Vs The State of Bihar

Pinku Mukhiya Vs The State of Bihar

Prabhu Dayal Vs The State of Bihar

Babuan Jha @ Hargovind Jha Vs The State of Bihar