Allowed

Md. Guljar v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC27 Nov 2019CR. MISC./71288/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court allowed bail to the petitioner in a theft case under Section 379 IPC, directing him to furnish a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement of the petitioner on bail by furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount to the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani.

Md. Guljar Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71288 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-232 Year-2019 Thana- MADHUBANI TOWN District-

¶3

Madhubani

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Md. Guljar Son of Mojibul Rahman @ Md. Majibul, Resident of Village - Naspatti (Nathpatti), P.S.- Ladaniya, Dist.- Madhubani.

¶6

... ... Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Gagan Deo Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Syed Mojibur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA

¶9

ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 27-11-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

¶11

counsel for the State.

¶12

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Madhubani Town P.S. Case No.232 of 2019, registered for the offence under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

The accusation is that the informant Sanjay Kumar Das after parking his vehicle in front of the State Bank of India, Main Branch, Madhubani, entered in the Bank and when he came out of the Bank, he did not find vehicle there but from the C.C.T.V. footage, he identified two persons, who were present near his vehicle.

¶14

Submission is that on the basis of C.C.T.V. Footage, the petitioner was apprehended by the police and on search, a

¶15

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71288 of 2019(2) dt.27-11-2019 2/2

¶16

Master-key and Rs.150/- has been recovered from the pocket of the petitioner and he was remanded in the present case on mere suspicion on 29.06.2019 and since then he is in custody. Further submission is that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶17

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Madhubani in connection with Madhubani Town P.S. Case No.232 of 2019.

¶18

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J.)

¶19

nawalkrs/-

¶20

U T

Md. Guljar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Guljar v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Savita Kumari Vs The State of Bihar

Kumari Khushboo Vs The State of Bihar

Indal Sahni Vs The State of Bihar

Aditya Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Pradeep Paswan Vs The State of Bihar

Ram Pravesh Choudhary @ Fate Choudhary @ Fatu Choudhary Vs The State of Bihar