Allowed

Sakir Alam v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC3 Jul 2019CR. MISC./25884/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Anticipatory bail was granted to the petitioner in a criminal case involving offences under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 406, 471, and 120B of the IPC, subject to conditions including furnishing a bail bond and cooperating in the investigation.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000 with two sureties and complying with Section 438(2) CrPC conditions.

Sakir Alam Vs The State of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25884 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-260 Year-2017 Thana- KISHANGANJ District- Kishanganj

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SAKIR ALAM Son of Saifuddin Resident of Village - Tegharia, Kanahaiyabari, P.s.- Kochadhaman, Distt.- Kishanganj.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Vijay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mukeshwar Dayal ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 03-07-2019

¶12

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶13

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Kishanganj P.S.Case No.260 of 2017, registered for offences punishable under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 406, 471, 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

FIR reveals that some of the employees of the Reliance Life Insurance Co. Ltd. got issued insurance policy in the name of fake person.

¶15

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the policy was taken by some other person and not by the petitioner and he is only nominee and he has not been paid any policy amount up till now and one of the co-accused has been granted regular bail.

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25884 of 2019(4) dt.03-07-2019 2/2

¶17

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

¶18

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of order be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/(Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Kishanganj in connection with Kishanganj P.S.Case No.260 of 2017, subject to condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure with condition that he has to co-operate in the investigation an appear as and when required.

¶19

With the aforesaid direction, this application is allowed.

¶20

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶21

chn/-

Sakir Alam v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sakir Alam v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Anzarul Haque Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Raj Kumar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Abdullah Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Rakesh Kumar @ Rakesh Kumar Raut Vs The State of Bihar

Mithun Kumar Sharma Vs The State of Bihar

Arun Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar