Allowed

Gautam Kumar Choudhary @ Gautam Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC15 Jan 2019CR. MISC./1964/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a Sessions trial for murder, cheating, and arms offence, directing release on furnishing a bail bond with sureties conditioned upon extending full co-operation in the trial.

What did the court decide?

Relaxe on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount subject to condition of full co-operation in trial.

Gautam Kumar Choudhary @ Gautam Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.1964 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-543 Year-2016 Thana- KANTI THARMAL POWER DistrictMuzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Gautam Kumar Choudhary @ Gautam Kumar, son of Surendra Choudhary, resident of Village- Sirsiya, P.S.- Kanti, District- Muzaffarpur.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mrs. Anita Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER

¶8

2 15-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and State.

¶9

The petitioner is in custody in connection with

¶10

Sessions Trial No. 616 of 2017, arising out of Kanti P.S. Case No. 543 of 2016, for the offence under Sections 302, 448/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

¶11

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier the petitioner approached this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 17076 of 2017 and Cr. Misc. No. 21716 of 2018. He further submits that by order dated 18.04.2018 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 21716 of 2018 a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court observed that if the trial is not concluded within six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of the order and there is no fault on the part of the petitioner, then he may renew his prayer for bail.

¶12

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1964 of 2019(2) dt.15-01-2019 2/2

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 09.01.2017.

¶14

Considering the fact that the prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected on 18.04.2018 and thereafter nine months have passed, but the trial is not concluded and also the statement made in para 15 onwards of the petition, particularly, para 19, which indicates that the petitioner is not responsible for delay in conclusion of the trial, the petitioner, named above, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of 6^th Additional Sessions Judge, Muzaffarpur in connection with Sessions Trial No. 616 of 2017, arising out of Kanti P.S. Case No. 543 of 2016 with the condition that the petitioner would extend full co-operation in the trial of the case. In the event, the petitioner is found in delaying the trial, the trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶15

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)

¶16

uday/-

¶17

U T

Gautam Kumar Choudhary @ Gautam Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Gautam Kumar Choudhary @ Gautam Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjay Kumar @ Monu @ Charinchi Vs The State Of Bihar

Lalan Mukhiya Vs The State Of Bihar

Sattar Ansari Vs The State Of Bihar

Dr. Surendra Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Jyoti Ranjan Jha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Raju Paswan @ Raju Kumar Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar