Allowed

Sunnil Rajbanshi v. the State of Bihar

Patna HC26 Mar 2019CR. MISC./16923/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a criminal miscellaneous matter arising from a police station case concerning unlawful possession of an arms, the court allowed the petitioner's bail application after considering the period of custody and granted release on a bond with conditions.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, close relatives of the petitioner, under specified conditions.

Sunnil Rajbanshi Vs the State of Bihar — Cheque Dishonour | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16923 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-355 Year-2018 Thana- BIHARSHARIF District- Nalanda

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SUNNIL RAJBANSHI Son of Sita Ram Rajbanshi Resident of VillageThakursthan, P.S.- Rajgir, District- Nalanda.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

THE STATE OF BIHAR Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Samir Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Yogendra Kumar Singh ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 26-03-2019

¶12

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

¶13

learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶14

The petitioner seeks bail in Bihar P.S. Case No. 355/2018, instituted for offence under Section(s) 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code read with Sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of Arms Act.

¶15

It is alleged in the written report that one loaded ountry made pistol and one live cartridge have been recovered from possession of this petitioner.

¶16

Petitioner is in custody since 04.08.2018.

¶17

Keeping in view the period of custody of petitioner, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like

¶18

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16923 of 2019(2) dt.26-03-2019 2/2

¶19

amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif, in connection with Bihar P.S. Case No. 355/2018, subject to the conditions that

¶20

(I) both the bailors shall be the close relative

¶21

of the petitioner.

¶22

(II) Petitioner shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without valid reason will result in cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner and

¶23

(III) if petitioner tamper with the evidence in the case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.

¶24

(Sanjay Priya, J)

¶25

rakhi/-

¶26

U T

Sunnil Rajbanshi v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunnil Rajbanshi v. the State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sarita Devi Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Uttam Mandal Vs the State of Bihar

Rahul Yadav @ Chotak Yadav @ Sunil Yadav Vs The State of Bihar

Santosh Kumar Vs The State of Bihar

Md. Abdul Vs The State of Bihar

Biren Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar