Allowed

Rahul Yadav @ Chotak Yadav @ Sunil Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC25 Mar 2019CR. MISC./15875/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Justice Sanjay Priya allowed the bail application of petitioner Rahul Yadav, subject to furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two close relative sureties, in Simri P.S. Case No. 130/2018 involving serious offences including murder.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of same amount, who must be close relatives.

Rahul Yadav @ Chotak Yadav @ Sunil Yadav Vs The… — Murder and Culpable Homicide | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.15875 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-130 Year-2018 Thana- SIMRI District- Buxar *

¶3

======================================================

¶4

RAHUL YADAV @ CHOTAK YADAV @ SUNIL YADAV Son of Rameshwar Yadav @ Rameshwar Singh Resident of Village- Badaki Chunni, P.S. Buxar (M), District- Buxar.

¶5

... ... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus

¶7

The State of Bihar Bihar

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Bachan Jee Ojha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Mohammad Sufyan ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER

¶11

2 25-03-2019 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

¶12

The petitioner seeks bail in Simri P.S. Case No. 130/2018, instituted for offences under Section(s) 363, 364, 302, 201 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that petitioner has no criminal antecedent.

¶14

It is alleged in the written report that son of Bua of informant was playing outside the house of informant. Later on he was found missing. Informant and other co-villagers searched him but he could not be traced out.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that F.I.R. is against unknown. Name of this petitioner has come

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.15875 of 2019(2) dt.25-03-2019 2/2

¶17

during investigation in the confessional statement of co-accused.

¶18

The other co-accused persons have already been granted bail by this Court in Cr. Misc. Nos. 77227/2018 dated 21.12.2018 and 73129/2018 dated 10.12.2018.

¶19

Petitioner is in custody since 23.10.2018.

¶20

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned District & Sessions Judge, Buxar, in connection with S.Tr. No. 292/2018, arising out of Simri P.S. Case No. 130/2018, subject to the conditions that both the bailors shall be the close relative of the petitioner.

¶21

(Sanjay Priya, J)

¶22

rakhi/-

¶23

U T

Rahul Yadav @ Chotak Yadav @ Sunil Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul Yadav @ Chotak Yadav @ Sunil Yadav v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amit Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Birendra Sah @ Bijendra Sah Vs The State Of Bihar

Rakesh Yadav @ Kala Kumar @ Rakesh Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Sarita Devi Vs The State of Bihar and Ors.

Uttam Mandal Vs the State of Bihar

Md. Salim Sahzad @ Salim Baba Vs the State of Bihar