Disposed

Sachetan Kumar v. the State of Bihar and Anr.

Patna HC19 Jun 2019CR. MISC./12946/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Oral order in a criminal miscellaneous petition. The petitioner feared arrest in a dowry and cruelty case. The court directed him to bring his wife to her marital home. Upon satisfying the court of his conduct, bail bonds will be confirmed for six months.

What did the court decide?

Directed petitioner to bring wife to sasural and file readiness affidavit; bail bond extendable for six months upon court satisfaction of conduct.

Sachetan Kumar Vs the State of Bihar and Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12946 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-569 Year-2018 Thana- EAST CHAMPARAN COMPLAINT District- East Champaran

¶3

====================================================== SACHETAN KUMAR S/o Mohan Thakur Resident of Khabra, P.S.Muzaffarpur Sadar, Distt.- Muzaffarpur.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

THE STATE OF BIHAR

¶7

Babita Devi W/o Sachetan Kumar, D/o Suresh Thakur Residing at Vill.Bara Baishahan, P.S.- Chakia, Distt.- East Champaran.

¶8

... ... Opposite Party/s

¶9

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Sangeet Deokuliar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Chandra Sen Prasad Singh ======================================================

¶10

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶11

4 19-06-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

¶12

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No.C-569 of 2018 , registered for offences punishable under Sections 323, 498A, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

¶13

Allegation against the petitioner is of subjecting his wife (O.P.no.2) of cruelty with respect of demand of dowry.

¶14

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he is still ready to keep his wife with dignity and care but she is not ready to come.

¶15

Heard learned A.P.P. and the learned counsel for the o.P.no.2. They have opposed the prayer for bail on the ground that she was subjected to assault. He has submitted that if she

¶16

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12946 of 2019(4) dt.19-06-2019 2/2

¶17

is allowed to live with dignity and care, she is ready to reside with the petitioner. .

¶18

In such view of the matter, the petitioner is directed to bring O.P.no.2 to her Sasural and it is expected that O.P.no.2 shall co-operate in the same and both of them will appear before the learned court below on 2.7.2019 and on filing an application by the petitioner that he is ready to keep her with dignity and care and will not assault her and ready to take her , his bail bond shall be extended for six months and during that period their conduct shall be watched by the learned court below by calling them in the first week of each month and once being satisfied with the conduct of both the parties especially the conduct of the petitioner, the learned court below shall confirm the bail bond of the petitioner or pass any other order or orders including the cancelling the bail bond of the petitioner.

¶19

With the aforesaid direction, this application is disposed of.

¶20

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶21

chn/- U T

Sachetan Kumar v. the State of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sachetan Kumar v. the State of Bihar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukesh Kumar Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Shakti Kishor @ Shakti Kishor Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Lambu Sah Vs The State of Bihar.

Rocky Chaudhary Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Subodh Kumar @ Subodh Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar

Surendra Kumar Vs the State of Bihar