51,51,000/- remained due with the complainant – opposite party no. 2 and since, the complainant – opposite party no. 2 was not in a position to return the outstanding money, hence, he offered to transfer the land in question by executing sale deed in the name of the father of the petitioner against a total consideration of Rs. 80,00,000/- and complainant – opposite party no. 2 gave an undertaking on 05.07.2015 that as soon as he would receive the outstanding amount of Rs. 28,49,000/-, in cash, he would register the land in question in favour of father of the petitioner. Thereafter, on receipt of the remaining sum, the complainant – opposite party no. 2 executed the sale deed and, hence, the allegation that petitioner has cheated him is false and concocted and the cheques in question were given by the petitioner to the complainant – opposite party no. 2 as he has offered the petitioner to get him the dealership of Ultratech Cement, which was later on fraudulently presented by the complainant – opposite party no. 2 before the Bank keeping the petitioner in dark. Therefore, it is the complainant – opposite party no. 2, who has cheated the petitioner and his father by executing the sale deed of land, which was already mortgaged with Central Bank, for which, father of petitioner has filed a complaint case being Complaint Case No. 166 of 2017 in the Court of learned
