Dismissed

Subodh Kumar @ Subodh Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Patna HC19 Jun 2019CR. MISC./11492/2019

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This matter dealt with a bail application. The single judge dismissed the application for regular bail because the petitioner was found to have forged his appointment, though he was directed to surrender for reconsideration by the court below.

What did the court decide?

Application dismissed; petitioner directed to surrender for regular bail consideration by the court below.

Subodh Kumar @ Subodh Kumar Singh Vs The State of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2019)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11492 of 2019

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-177 Year-2018 Thana- RUNISAIDPUR District- Sitamarhi

¶3

======================================================

¶4

SUBODH KUMAR @ SUBODH KUMAR SINGH Son of Ram Tahal Singh R/o village-Dasai Baghari, P.S- Runisaidpur, Dist- Sitamarhi, Permanent R/o village-Shambho, P. S- Sonbarsa, Dist- Begusarai

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Manoj Kumar Manoj For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Ajay Mishra ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶10

4 19-06-2019 Heard the parties.

¶11

This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Runisaidpur P.S.case No.177 of 2018 for the offences under Sections 406, 420, 468 and 409 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

Allegation against the petitioner is that he was working as Headmaster of Pandit Dayal High School Dashai Baghari Runisaidpur without any appointment and further appears that in view of direction of this Court in C.W.J.C. No.15130 of 2019, the enquiry was conducted by the District Magistrate with respect to his appointment and his appointment was found to be forged.

¶13

Submission of the learned counsel for the

¶14

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11492 of 2019(4) dt.19-06-2019 2/2

¶15

petitioner is that he has been appointed by the local Managing Committee and in pursuance to that he was working and there was no criminal intention against the petitioner and he has falsely been implicated in this case. He is ready to abide by any condition imposed upon him.

¶16

Heard learned A.P.P. , who has opposed the prayer for bail stating that prima facie there are materials against him as in pursuance of the order of this Court, his appointment was found illegal as such he does not deserve anticipatory bail..

¶17

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner , however, if he surrenders and pray for regular bail, the same shall be considered by the learned court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by the order of this Court and if possible to be disposed of on the same day.

¶18

With the above direction, this application is dismissed.

¶19

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶20

chn/-

¶21

U T

Subodh Kumar @ Subodh Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Subodh Kumar @ Subodh Kumar Singh v. The State of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mukesh Kumar Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Shakti Kishor @ Shakti Kishor Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Lambu Sah Vs The State of Bihar.

Rocky Chaudhary Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Sachetan Kumar Vs the State of Bihar and Anr.

Surendra Kumar Vs the State of Bihar