In an oral order, the High Court of Patna allowed the withdrawal of Writ Petition No.16527 of 2014 filed by Naazim Uddin against members of the State of Bihar education department, dismissing the writ as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16527 of 2014
======================================================
Naazim Uddin Son of Hashim Raeen Resident of Village - Pakribarawan, P.S. - Pakribarawan, District- Nawada.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Nayan, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sc6- Manindra Kishore Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER
2 25-09-2018 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the writ petition.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J)
spandey/-
U
Naazim Uddin
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
The District Magistrate, Nawada
The District Education Officer, Nawada
The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Nawada
The Block Development Officer, Pakribarawan, Nawada
Anil Kumar Upadhyay
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
