Oral order dismissing a writ application for non-prosecution due to absence of the petitioner's counsel. No substantive legal issue was discussed or determined by the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12753 of 2016
======================================================
Nirmala Devi, W/o Shree Niranjan Kumar @ Shree Niranjan Mandal, Resident of Mohalla- Raja Rani Talab, Police Station- Haveli Kharagpur, Post- Haveli Kharagpur, District- Munger.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
... ... Respondent/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER
2 20-11-2018 None appears on behalf of the petitioner, however
learned counsel for the respondent-State is present.
The present writ application is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)
Amrendra/-
U
Nirmala Devi
The State of Bihar
Inspector General of Registration
Assistant Inspector General of Registration
District Magistrate
Dinesh Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
