Disposed

Umesh Sharma v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC19 Nov 2018CWJC/10588/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court disposed of a writ petition seeking compensation for a hit-and-run accident. The petitioner's prayer was limited to a direction to dispose of an application rather than a substantive adjudication on merits. The Sub-Divisional Officer was directed to dispose of the pending application within four weeks.

What did the court decide?

Directed Respondent No.3 to dispose of petitioner's application within four weeks.

Umesh Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10588 of 2016

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Umesh Sharma, Son of Late Prahalad Sharma, resident of village-Dewapur, P.S.-Barauli, Distt-Gopalganj.

¶4

... ... Petitioner/s

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar

¶7

The Collector-cum-Claims settlement Commissioner/Chairman District Level Committee,Gopalganj.

¶8

The Sub Divisional Officer Cum Claim Inquiry Officer/ Member District Level Committee, Gopalganj.

¶9

The Divisional Manager The National Insurance Company Babunia Road, Chainpur Kothi Siwan.

¶10

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Akhilesh Kumar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Singh, AAG-11 For Respondent NO.4 : Mr. Ashok Priyadarshi, Adv. ======================================================

¶11

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH

¶12

ORAL JUDGMENT

¶13

Date : 25-09-2020

¶14

Heard learned Counsels for the petitioner, respondentState and Respondent No.4.

¶15

The present writ application has been filed for a direction to the respondent authorities, particularly, Respondent No.3, the Sub-Divisional Officer-cum-Claim Enquiry Officer, Member District Level Committee, Gopalganj to make payment of compensation from solatium fund for the death of the son of the petitioner, namely, Ram Babu Sharma, who died in a hit and run motor accident in the year 2008.

¶16

Patna High Court CWJC No.10588 of 2016 dt.25-09-2020 2/3

¶17

However, learned counsel for the petitioner confines his prayer only to the extent of a direction for disposal of the application submitted on 10.11.2008 by the petitioner before the Respondent No.3, as contained in Annexure-2, as per Solatium Scheme, 1989.

¶18

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the identity of the vehicle which hit the son of the petitioner causing his death could not be ascertained, but since the application was submitted before the Respondent No.3, the Sub-Divisional Officer, being the Claim Enquiry Officer, hence, the same may be disposed of. The petitioner has impleaded National Insurance Company as party respondent in the present proceeding for the proper adjudication of the issue involved.

¶19

It is submitted by Mr. Ashok Priyadarshi, learned counsel for the Respondent No.4 that if the identity of the vehicle in question could not be ascertained, no claim can lie against the Insurance Company.

¶20

Though this Court finds substance in the submission of learned counsel for the Respondent No.4, however, keeping in view, the confined prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is not expressing any opinion on the merits of the claim of the petitioner. However, it is expected from the

¶21

Patna High Court CWJC No.10588 of 2016 dt.25-09-2020 3/3

¶22

Respondent No.3, the Sub-Divisional Officer-cum-Claim Enquiry Officer, Member District Level Committee, Gopalganj to dispose of the application of the petitioner, as contained in Annexure-2, within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, in accordance with law.

¶23

Accordingly, the writ application stands disposed of.

¶24

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶25

Ashwini/-Anil/-

¶26

AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date

Umesh Sharma v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Umesh Sharma v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Makbul Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Akhil Kumar Roy Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rishav Kumar Alias Rishav Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Pawan Kumar Pandit Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Nand Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Raj Kishore Mandal and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.