Dismissed

Neeraj Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC20 Nov 2018CWJC/11474/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna, in Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 11474 of 2016, heard a petition seeking release of a subsidy amount. Upon confirmation that the amount was already paid, the petitioner sought withdrawal with liberty. The court permitted withdrawal and dismissed the application.

What did the court decide?

Permission accorded to withdraw the writ application with liberty to agitate the issue of interest; application dismissed as withdrawn.

Neeraj Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11474 of 2016

¶2

======================================================

¶3

Neeraj Kumar Singh, Son of Late Nawal Kishore Singh, Resident of VillageDaiyakharwar, P.S.- Lakhnaur, District - Madhubani.

¶4

... ... Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Bihar.

¶7

The Principal Secretary, Animal & Fisheries Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶8

The Director, Fisheries, Fisheries Directorate, Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The District Magistrate, Madhubani.

¶10

The Deputy Fisheries Director, Darbhanga Region, Darbhanga.

¶11

The District Fisheries Officer cum Chief Executive Officer, Madhubani.

¶12

... ... Respondent/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar Jha For the Respondent/s : Mr. Raj Nandan Prasad ======================================================

¶14

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶15

2 20-11-2018

¶16

Heard Mr. Manoj Kumar Jha, learned counsel for the

¶17

petitioner and learned AC to SC 11 for the respondent-State.

¶18

The present writ application has been filed for a direction to the respondent authorities to release the subsidy amount to the tune of Rs. 6,71,155/- along with interest approved in favour of M/s G.Y.S. Sangam Matsya Hatchery Daiyakharwar, District Madhubani.

¶19

In view of the specific statement made in paragraph no.6 of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of Respondent Nos. 2, 3, 5 and 6 to the effect that subsidy amount has already been paid to the petitioner on 30.07.2016, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ application with liberty to agitate the issue with regard to

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.11474 of 2016(2) dt.20-11-2018 2/2

¶21

interest before the appropriate forum.

¶22

Permission is accorded.

¶23

Accordingly, the present writ application is dismissed

¶24

as withdrawn with above mentioned liberty to the petitioner.

¶25

(Dinesh Kumar Singh, J)

¶26

Amrendra/-

¶27

Neeraj Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Neeraj Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Umesh Sharma Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Pawan Kumar Pandit Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Nand Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ramesh Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Diwakar Prasad Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Nirmala Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.