Oral order dismissing a criminal miscellaneous petition as not pressed because the petitioner appeared neither in person nor by counsel despite the trial court having disposed of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.37348 of 2018
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -136 Year- 2000 Thana -AKBARPUR District- NAWADA
====================================================== Surendra Yadav, Son of Late Laxman Yadav, resident of Village- Hudrahi, Police Station- Akbarpur, District- Nawada.
.... .... Petitioner Versus
The State of Bihar
.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : None For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Pushpa Sinha, APP 121 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER
5 12-09-2018 The letter no. 160 dated 24.07.2018 of learned Additional Sessions Judge, Nawada goes to show that S. T. No. 289/16/141/16 was fixed for pronouncement of Judgment and therefore, it appears that case of the petitioner has already been disposed of by the learned trial court.
However, no one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this petition. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor is present. Accordingly, this petition filed in connection with Akbarpur P. S. Case No. 136 of 2000 stands dismissed being not pressed.
(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)
SHAHZAD/- Rajeev
U T
Surendra Yadav
The State of Bihar
Hemant Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
