Dismissed

Vivek Mishra @ Vivek Kumar Mishra v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC5 Sept 2018CR. MISC./46924/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court rejected the petitioner's bail application in a criminal case. The court noted the petitioner has been in custody for four years with the trial delayed due to the absence of co-accused and failure to record the section 313 statement. While denying bail, the court directed the trial court to try the petitioner's case separately from the absent accused within three months.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner's prayer for bail rejected; trial court directed to try petitioner's case separately within three months.

Vivek Mishra @ Vivek Kumar Mishra Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.46924 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -287 Year- 2014 Thana -BRAHMPUR District- BUXAR

¶3

====================================================== Vivek Mishra @ Vivek Kumar Mishra

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shashi Chandra Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri S.M. Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶5

3 05-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶6

The petitioner appears to be main assailant and taking note of the aforesaid fact that earlier this court rejected the bail prayer of the petitioner but submission on behalf of the petitioner is that he is languishing in jail custody for near about four years and up till now, his trial could not be concluded.

¶7

The learned trial court has reported that the case was pending for recording the statement under section 313 of the Cr. P. C but due to none appearance of some co-accused, the bail bonds of those accused was cancelled and now the case is pending for appearance of those accused persons.

¶8

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to release the

¶9

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46924 of 2018 (3) dt.05-09-2018

¶10

2/2

¶11

petitioner on bail and, accordingly, his prayer for bail in connection with S. T. No. 54 of 2015 arising out of Brahmpur P. S. Case No. 287 of 2014 pending in the court of 2^nd Additional Sessions Judge, Buxar is, hereby, rejected.

¶12

However, the learned trial court is directed to proceed with the trial of the petitioner even by separating the case of the petitioner from the case of those accused, who have been absconding and disposed of the case of the petitioner within three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

¶13

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)

¶14

N.K/-

¶15

Vivek Mishra @ Vivek Kumar Mishra v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vivek Mishra @ Vivek Kumar Mishra v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harihar Nath Jha Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Ranjit Yadav @ Karu @ Karu Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Babu Prasad Vs Shyam Babu Prasad and Ors.

Dhirendra Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Santosh Manjhi Vs The State Of Bihar

Gangajali Devi and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.