Allowed

Dhirendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC5 Sept 2018CR. MISC./2621/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court released the petitioner on bail in a criminal trial pending investigation at the Sessions stage, subject to furnishing bonds and conditions regarding a surety being a close relative, noting the long period of custody and the stage of the trial.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner released on bail by furnishing bonds of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount, subject to the condition that one surety is a close relative.

Dhirendra Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.2621 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -50 Year- 2007 Thana -NARPATGANJ District- ARRARIA

¶3

====================================================== 1. Dhirendra Yadav S/o Late Parshuram Yadav, R/o Village- Chiknapatti, P.S.- Raghopur, District- Supaul.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Lakshmi Kant Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER

¶5

11 05-09-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

¶6

Petitioner is in jail custody since 20.01.2014 and the letter no. 144 dated 01.05.2018 of the learned 2^nd Additional Sessions Judge, Araria goes to show that the charge against the petitioner could be framed on 27.03.2018 and up till now, only two prosecution witnesses could be examined.

¶7

However, it is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the name of this petitioner came in this case in the statement of Ramesh Goswami, whose statement was recorded by the Investigation Officer at Para- 11 of the case diary but subsequently, the aforesaid Ramesh Goswami was also made accused by the police. It is further submitted that co-accused

¶8

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2621 of 2018 (11) dt.05-09-2018

¶9

2/2

¶10

Ramesh Goswami has already been granted privilege of bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 19.07.2013 passed in Cr. Misc No. 9204 of 2013 (S. T No. 707 of 2012).

¶11

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, and also taking note of stage of the trial as well as period of custody of the petitioner, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 2^nd Additional Sessions Judge, Araria in connection with Session Trial no. 189 of 2014 arising out of Narpatganj P.S.Case No. 50 of 2007/ G.R.No. 280 of 2007, subject to the condition that one of the sureties must be a close relative of the petitioner and shall swear an affidavit to this effect as to how he/she is related to the petitioner.

¶12

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J)

¶13

N.K/-

¶14

U T

Dhirendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhirendra Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Harihar Nath Jha Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Ranjit Yadav @ Karu @ Karu Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Babu Prasad Vs Shyam Babu Prasad and Ors.

Vivek Mishra @ Vivek Kumar Mishra Vs The State Of Bihar

Santosh Manjhi Vs The State Of Bihar

Gangajali Devi and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.