Single judge order granting bail to petitioner who is in custody. Bail granted on security of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties in a theft and cheating case from Ahiyapur P.S. Muzaffarpur.
Release of the petitioner on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.35492 of 2018
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2017 Thana- AHIAPUR District- Muzaffarpur
======================================================
LADDAN @ MD. LADLEY @ LALAN @ MD. LADELY Son of Md. Ishakh resident of Village Shekhpura, P.S. Ahiyapur, District Muzaffarpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s
====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Kant Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt Sangeeta Sharma ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER
4 18-08-2018
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel for the State.
The petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 10 of 2017 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 457, 380, 411 of the Indian Penal Code.
Informant in his written complaint has stated that on 01.01.2017 when he returned to his house after treatment in P.G.I., Lucknow he found the lock to be broken and household articles were stolen by unidentified thieves. When he went to the police station to lodge FIR, he found that his household articles were kept on a tempo standing in the police station, when the owner of the tempo was contacted it was
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.35492 of 2018(4) dt.18-08-2018 2/2
alleged that owner and driver of the tempo had stolen his household articles by breaking open his house. During investigation, the owner of the tempo named petitioner that he had given tempo to ply on daily wages and on basis of such statement, petitioner was apprehended.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated by the owner of the tempo as he has some dispute with his family members. It has further been submitted that petitioner is in custody since 28.03.2018.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Judge-15-cum-learned A.C.J.M., Muzaffarpu, in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No. 10 of 2017.
(S. Kumar, J)
veena/-
U T
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in connection_with Charges under Sections 457, 380, 411 IPC.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
LADDAN @ MD. LADLEY @ LALAN @ MD. LADELY
The State of Bihar
S. Kumar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
