Allowed

Pyare Bind @ Ram Pyare Bind v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC22 Jun 2018CR. MISC./33275/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a criminal case. The court addressed the petitioner's long custody and delay in framing charges but imposed conditions for the bail bonds.

What did the court decide?

Release of the petitioner on bail with a bond of Rs. 25,000 and two like sureties, subject to specific conditions regarding local surety and cooperation in trial.

Pyare Bind @ Ram Pyare Bind Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.33275 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -3 Year- 2017 Thana -CHAINPUR District- BHABHUA (KAIMUR)

¶3

====================================================== Pyare Bind @ Ram Pyare Bind, son of Late Lala Bind, resident of VillageBaheriya, P.S. Chand, District- Kaimur.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner

¶5

Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sada Nand Roy For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Panchanand Pandit

¶6

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶7

2 22-06-2018

¶8

Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 24.07.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 30641 of 2017 with an observation to conclude the trial within a period of nine months.

¶9

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that nine months has already expired and uptill now charge has not been framed. Further submission is that the co-accused who has been named in the FIR has been granted bail by the co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 09.11.2017 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 51893 of 2017 and the petitioner is in custody for more

¶10

than one year and only on the basis of confessional statement petitioner’s name transpired in this case.

¶11

Heard learned A.P.P also.

¶12

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33275 of 2018 (2) dt.22-06-2018

¶13

2/2

¶14

Having heard both sides and in the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, named above, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional District Judge-IV, Kaimur at Bhabua, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 374 of 2017/368 of 2017 arising out of Chainpur P.S. Case No. 03 of 2017, on the condition that one of the bailors shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned and further condition that the petitioner shall co-operate in disposal of the trial.

¶15

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶16

Priyanka/Srikant/-

¶17

Pyare Bind @ Ram Pyare Bind v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pyare Bind @ Ram Pyare Bind v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishna Ravidas Vs The State Of Bihar

Khurshid Alam @ Guddu Vs The State Of Bihar

Raja Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar

Raghubansh Kumar @ Vikram Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Pratap Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Sipahi No. 796 Anil Kumar @ Anil Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar