Allowed

Khurshid Alam @ Guddu v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC21 Jun 2018CR. MISC./31842/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge oral order granting bail to the petitioner charged with an NDPS offence. The court noted the expiry of a previously granted five-month trial deadline noting only two hostile witnesses were examined and recovery was less than commercial quantity.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 with two sureties and conditions regarding local Bailer and cooperation in trial.

Khurshid Alam @ Guddu Vs The State Of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.31842 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -18 Year- 2017 Thana -KARJA District- MUZAFFARPUR

¶3

====================================================== Khurshid Alam @ Guddu, Son of Md. Salim, Resident of Village/Mohalla- Kaparpura, P.S.- Kanti, District- Muzaffarpur.

¶4

.... .... Petitioner Versus The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

¶5

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Niranjan Parihar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anand Mohan Prasad Mehta

¶6

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER

¶7

2 21-06-2018

¶8

Earlier prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected by this Court vide order dated 19.7.2017 passed in Cr.Misc.No. 30433 of 2017 with observation to conclude the trial within a period of five months.

¶9

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that period of five months has already expired and till date only two witnesses have been examined and have been declared hostile and there was recovery of 3 kg and 150 grams of ganja which is less than commercial quantity and petitioner is in custody since 8.2.2017.

¶10

Heard learned APP also.

¶11

In the facts and circumstances and also considering the period of custody, let the petitioner, above named, be released on

¶12

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31842 of 2018 (2) dt.21-06-2018

¶13

2/2

¶14

bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Karja P.S.Case No. 18 of 2017 with condition that one of the bailors shall be a local person having sufficient immoveable properties within the jurisdiction of court concerned and with further condition that he has to co-operate in disposal of trial.

¶15

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J)

¶16

spal/-

¶17

Khurshid Alam @ Guddu v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Khurshid Alam @ Guddu v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kanchan Devi Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Niraj Mani Tiwari Vs The State Of Bihar

Manoj Yadav @ Manoj Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Krishna Ravidas Vs The State Of Bihar

Raja Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar

Mangal Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar