Allowed

Din Dayal Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC19 Apr 2018CR. MISC./22810/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court at Patna granted bail to the petitioner, aged 78, who was in custody in connection with his sons' involvement in a development agreement dispute. The court directed the petitioner to be released upon furnishing a bail bond.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be released on bail upon furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of similar amounts.

Din Dayal Prasad Vs The State Of Bihar — Corruption | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.22810 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-629 Year-2017 Thana- KOTWALI District- Patna

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Din Dayal Prasad, son of Late Kishun Lal Sau resident of Mohalla - Gulab Bagh, Near Hathua Market, P.S. - Kadamkuan, District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pranav Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Kalyan Shankar ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

2 19-04-2018

¶11

Heard learned counsels for the petitioner and the State as

¶12

learned counsel for the informant. .

¶13

The petitioner, already in custody, seeks bail in connection with Kotwali P.S.Case No. 629 of 2017 registered under Sections 409, 417, 418, 419, 420, 461, 468, 504, 506 and 120B of the Indian penal Code.

¶14

Allegation in brief is that four sons of the petitioner entered into a development agreement with the informant, a builder, and advance money was also taken by his sons after entering into agreement to the tune of Rs. 2.20 crores but later on, they mortgaged the same piece of land with the State Bank of India and have taken loan and now threatening to sell the land to some other person.

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that agreement is not executed between the petitioner and the

¶16

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.22810 of 2018(2) dt.19-04-2018 2/2

¶17

informant rather in between the four sons of the petitioner and the developer and further contention is that it may be a term of breach of contract so predominantly a case of civil in nature and the petitioner is 78 years old man having no criminal liability to be fastened on the petitioner, who is in custody since 09.01.2018.

¶18

Whereas learned counsel for the informant submits that the petitioner is father of all four accused persons who have entered into an agreement for development of their land but later on the petitioner also agreed to return the money taken in advance by his sons despite that neither money is returned back nor possession of the land was given for development.

¶19

Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances, in particular the petitioner not a party to deed of agreement of development, so he is directed to be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Patna in connection with Kotwali P.S. Case No. 629 of 2017.

¶20

(Arun Kumar, J)

¶21

sujit/-

¶22

U T

Din Dayal Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Din Dayal Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Devendra Prasad Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Ranjeet Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Dinesh Kumar @ Guddu Vs The State Of Bihar

Krishna Prasad Verma Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Punit Kumar Gupta Vs The State Of Bihar

Abusar Alam @ Md. Abusar Vs The State Of Bihar