Allowed

Ranjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC18 Apr 2018CR. MISC./12261/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Hon'ble Justice Arun Kumar granted bail to the petitioner, who was in custody, in an FIR under Section 392 IPC regarding robbery, directing his release on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties subject to specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

The petitioner was directed to be released on bail on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Muzaffarpur.

Ranjeet Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2018)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.12261 of 2018

¶2

Arising Out of PS. Case No.-736 Year-2016 Thana- AHIAPUR District- Muzaffarpur

¶3

======================================================

¶4

Ranjeet Kumar S/o Kailash Prasad, R/o Village- Bhikhanpur, P.S.- Ahiyapur, District- Muzaffarpur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Pawan Kumar Singh, Advocate Mr. Pradhan Murli Manohar Prasad, Advocate Mr. Raju Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh, APP ======================================================

¶9

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR ORAL ORDER

¶10

3 18-04-2018

¶11

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

¶12

Petitioner, already in custody, seeks bail in connection with Ahiyapur PS Case No.736 of 2016 registered under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

Allegation in brief is that while the informant was going to bank to deposit Rs.1,50,000/-, on the way some miscreants robbed him of the cash.

¶14

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that nothing has been recovered from possession of the petitioner, he was also not put on TIP, the only material transpires in the case diary is that he was seen moving around the place of occurrence prior to the occurrence and he is in custody since 03.12.2016.

¶15

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12261 of 2018(3) dt.18-04-2018 2/2

¶16

Having considered the aforesaid facts and circumstances, petitioner Ranjeet Kumar is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned CJM, Muzaffarpur in connection with Ahiyapur PS Case No.736 of 2016 with following conditions:

¶17

(1) One of the bailors must be the close family member of the petitioner.

¶18

(2) The petitioner shall remain physically present on each and every date before the trial court as and when required and if he absents himself on two consecutive dates without any reasonable cause, his bail bond shall liable to be cancelled.

¶19

(Arun Kumar, J)

¶20

S.KUMAR/-

¶21

U T

Ranjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sudha Devi Vs The State Of Bihar

Ram Babu @ Babulal @ Ajit Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Suran Das @ Suran Harijan and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar

Devendra Prasad Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Dinesh Kumar @ Guddu Vs The State Of Bihar

Shahid Parvej @ Mohan @ Rehan Vs The State Of Bihar