Disposed

Md. Shakil Jamal v. The Union Of India and Ors.

Patna HC3 May 2017CWJC/3890/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court directed the Commercial Manager to pay admitted dues and decide on security release within three months. A failure to act within this period entitles the petitioner to 18% interest. The writ petition was disposed of in light of these directions.

What did the court decide?

Direction to Commercial Manager to pay admitted dues and decide on security release within three months; 18% interest if inaction persists.

Md. Shakil Jamal Vs The Union Of India and Ors. — Contract and Commercial Disputes | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

Patna High Court CWJC No.3890 of 2017 (2) dt.03-05-2017

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3890 of 2017

¶4

======================================================

¶5

Md. Shakil Jamal Son of Late Lalldin, Resident of Village-Ghadmari, Ward, No. 4, P.S. Mokama, District-Patna.

¶6

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The Union of India through the Secretary, Department of Rail, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi.

¶9

The Divisional Railway Manager, (D.R.M.), East Central Railways, Danapur, Patna.

¶10

The Senior Divisional Electrical Engineer, East Central Railway, Dhanbad, Patna.

¶11

Senior Divisional Finance Manager, East Central Tailways, Danapur, Patna.

¶12

.... .... Respondent/s

¶13

====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prafull Chandra Thakur,

¶14

Mr. Dinesh Choudhary For the Respondent/s : Mrs. Binita Singh

¶15

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶16

2 03-05-2017 Heard the parties.

¶17

In the present case petitioner has made a prayer for payment of admitted dues with panel interest.

¶18

Petitioner has participated in the Tender No.8/66/Tender/37/Ltd./DNR/2000-2001 for execution of certain work. He was declared successful bidder and accordingly work was allotted to him whereafter he has executed the work within the time but grievance has been raised by petitioner that he has not been paid any single farthing nor his security money has been returned. He has

¶19

Patna High Court CWJC No.3890 of 2017 (2) dt.03-05-2017

¶20

¶21

approached to the authority concerned. Even though he has given legal notice but it has not given any result.

¶22

In such view of the matter, this Court directs the Commercial Manager, Eastern Central Railway, Danapur, Patna to consider his case and take decision and pay the admitted dues to the petitioner which he is entitled and also take decision with respect to release of security amount.

¶23

For convenience, petitioner is directed file a detailed representation before the Commercial Manager, Eastern Central Railway, Danapur, Patna who will consider the case of the petitioner and take decision within a period of three months from the date of filing of the representation. If action has not been taken within the aforesaid time the petitioner will be entitled for interest at the rate pf 18%.

¶24

With the aforesaid observation and direction this writ petition is disposed of.

¶25

(Shivaji Pandey, J)

¶26

Vinay/-

¶27

Md. Shakil Jamal v. The Union Of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Shakil Jamal v. The Union Of India and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kameshwar Pandey Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Md. Jamiruddin @ Md. Jamiruddin Ansari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Mahendra Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Pramod Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ramanandan Paswan @ Nata Vs The State Of Bihar

Sunil Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar