Allowed

Ramanandan Paswan @ Nata v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC3 May 2017CR. MISC./17985/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted bail to the petitioner in an Arms Act case after considering the period of custody. Bail was granted on ₹10,000 with two sureties, subject to specific conditions regarding family surety, future conduct, and court appearance.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on bond of ₹10,000 with two sureties each of like amount to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda.

Ramanandan Paswan @ Nata Vs The State Of Bihar — Narcotics (NDPS) | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.17985 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -203 Year- 2016 Thana -RAHUI District- NALANDA

¶3

(BIHARSHARIFF)

¶4

====================================================== Ramanandan Paswan @ Nata son of Deoki Paswan @ Sadhu Jee, resident of village –Bokna, PS-Rahui (Bhaganbigha), District-Nalanda.

¶5

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶6

Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : . Sri Ajay Kumar-1

¶7

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER

¶8

2 03-05-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

¶9

In this case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with Rahui (Bhaganbigha) P.S. Case No. 203 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under sections 25(1-b) (a)/26 of the Arms Act.

¶10

The petitioner had earlier moved before this Court for bail in Cr. Misc. No. 45822 of 2016 and this Court, vide order dated 24.10.2016 rejected the same with liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completion of eight months in jail-custody.

¶11

The counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 26.07.2016.

¶12

Having considered the period of custody, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail

¶13

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17985 of 2017 (2) dt.03-05-2017

¶14

2/2

¶15

bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nalanda at Biharsharif in connection with Rahui (Bhaganbigha) P.S. Case No. 203 of 2016, subject to the following conditions:-

¶16

(i) One of the bailors shall be father/mother/wife/son

¶17

of the petitioner.

¶18

(ii) If the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of case, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail,

¶19

(iii) The petitioner would cooperate in the proceeding of the court below. In event of failure to appear on two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to pass the order, including cancellation of bail bonds of the petitioner.

¶20

(Shivaji Pandey, J)

¶21

Mahesh/-

¶22

U T

Ramanandan Paswan @ Nata v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ramanandan Paswan @ Nata v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kameshwar Pandey Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Md. Jamiruddin @ Md. Jamiruddin Ansari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Mahendra Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Md. Shakil Jamal Vs The Union Of India and Ors.

Pramod Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sunil Mandal Vs The State Of Bihar