Dismissed

Krishna Bind v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC11 Oct 2017CR. MISC./39546/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court, in a regular bail matter, rejected the petitioner's prayer due to serious allegations of murdering his wife and child. The Court directed the trial to conclude within six months and held the police responsible for procuring witness attendance.

What did the court decide?

Bail prayed for by the Petitioner was rejected; Trial directed to conclude within six months.

Krishna Bind Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.39546 of 2017

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -69 Year- 2014 Thana -OBRA District- AURANGABAD

¶3

====================================================== 1. Krishna Bind Son of Mahabir Bind Resident of Village Bel Tole Bahadur Bigha, P.S. Obra, District- Aurangabad (Bihar) .... Petitioner Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner : Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Akshay Lal Pandit, APP 75 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER

¶4

3 11-10-2017 Heard both sides.

¶5

The petitioner seeks bail in Sessions Trial No. 43 of 2015/504 of 2015 arising out of Obra P.S. Case No. 69 of 2014 registered under Sections 304B, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶6

The prayer for bail of the petitioner was rejected earlier on 21.04.2015 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 7692 of 2015.

¶7

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in jail for more than three years, but, the trial has not yet been concluded.

¶8

It appears, from the perusal of the record that there is allegation against the petitioner that he burnt his wife and a minor child to death.

¶9

Considering the allegation, made against the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

¶10

The prayer for bail is rejected .

¶11

The report of the Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Fast Track Court, VII, Aurangabad, has been received, in which it has been stated that two witnesses have been examined. The trial

¶12

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.39546 of 2017 (3) dt.11-10-2017

¶13

2/2

¶14

Court is directed to hold the trial on day-to-day basis and conclude the same within six months, from the date of receipt of this order.

¶15

The Superintendent of Police, Aurangabad, is directed to ensure the appearance of the non-examined witnesses of Sessions Trial No. 43 of 2015/504 of 2015 arising out of Obra P.S. Case No. 69 of 2014 so that the trial must be concluded within the stipulated time.

¶16

Let a copy of this order be sent to the learned trial Court and the Superintendent of Police, Aurangabad, for information and needful.

¶17

It is, further, made clear that if on any date the Superintendent of Police, Aurangabad, fails to present the witness(es), the learned trial Court shall inform this Court and if the trial is not concluded within the stipulated time, the petitioner may renew his prayer for bail.

¶18

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶19

SA/-

¶20

U √ T √

Krishna Bind v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Krishna Bind v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Md. Islam Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Md. Adil Hussain and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Nidhi Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Chhanguri Mahaldar Vs The State Of Bihar

Meena Kumari @ Meena Devi Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Anil Kumar Paswan and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.