Dismissed

Md. Adil Hussain and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC10 Oct 2017CWJC/5023/2014

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners sought writs to quash an advertisement for Aman posts, demand one-time absorption, and modify eligibility criteria. The court noted that based on a prior Division Bench decision, the petitioners lost interest in pursuing the matter.

What did the court decide?

Writ petition dismissed as petitioners lost interest in pursuing the matter subsequent to a prior Division Bench judgment.

Md. Adil Hussain and Ors. Vs The State Of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Patna HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5023 of 2014

¶3

=========================================================== 1. Md. Adil Hussain Son Of Md. Yasin Resident Of Near Agarwa Muszid, Police Station - Motihari, District - East Champaran

¶4

Uday Prakash Son Of Lakshami Prasad Chaudhary Resident Of Village & Post - Ashobhi, Police Station - Bairganiya, District - Sitamarhi

¶5

Krishna Prasad Kushwaha Son Of Chhotelal Prasad Kushwaha Resident Of Gahiri Tola Gamhariya, Police Station - Jhakhra, District - West Champaran

¶6

Jata Shankar Singh Son Of Bhup Narayan Rai Resident Of Village & Post - Ghiwadhar, Police Station - Harsiddhi, District - East Champaran

¶7

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶8

Versus

¶9

The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue & Land Reforms, Government Of Bihar, Patna

¶10

The Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel & Administrative Reforms Government Of Bihar, Patna

¶11

The Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna, Through It'S Chairman

¶12

The Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna

¶13

The District Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari

¶14

The Additional Collector (Revenue) East Champaran, Motihari

¶15

The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, East Champaran, Motihari

¶16

The Deputy Director Of Police, Muzaffarpur Range, Muzaffarpur

¶17

The Sub-Divisional Officer, East Champaran, Motihari

¶18

The Circle Officer, Banjaria, East Champaran, Motihari

¶19

The Circle Officer, Chiraiya, East Champaran, Motihari

¶20

The Circle Officer, Paharpur, East Champaran, Motihari

¶21

The Circle Officer, Motihari, East Champaran, Motihari

¶22

.... .... Respondent/s

¶23

=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. For the Respondent/s : Mr. KUNDAN BHADUR SINGH

¶24

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL JUDGMENT

¶25

Date: 10-10-2017

¶26

Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners. Learned

¶27

counsel for the State is present.

¶28

The petitioners in this writ petition seek following

¶29

reliefs:-

¶30

I) For issuance of writ in the nature of

¶31

Patna High Court CWJC No.5023 of 2014 dt.10-10-2017 2

¶32

certiorari to quash the Advertisement No. 01010114 published through Notification No. 604 (4)/Patna, dt. 13/12/2013, by which the respondent Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna (hereinafter referred to as the Commission) inviting online applications for regular appointment on the post of Amin .

¶33

II) For issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents authorities to make one time absorption of the petitioners and other, who were appointed through proper channel adopting all the procedures by the competent selection committee against the vacant and sanctioned post.

¶34

III) For issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing/commanding the respondents to stay the further process of Advertisement No. 01010114 till disposal of this case.

¶35

IV) For issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to regularize the petitioners, who have already been appointed following proper criteria, i.e. Examination, Interview/practical etc. And their services has been extended time and again.

¶36

¶37

V) For issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent to modify the minimum qualification as the petitioners and other serving as Amin on being Matriculation , but the present Advertisement No. 01010114 provides for Intermediate as minimum qualification.

¶38

VI) For issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to grant the weightage as given in other appointment procedure like ANM & Agriculture Coordinator etc. to the petitioners for their working experience as they are continuously serving to the best satisfaction of the commanding authorities since last

¶39

Patna High Court CWJC No.5023 of 2014 dt.10-10-2017 3

¶40

two years approximately.

¶41

VII) For directing the respondents to exempt the petitioners from the examination or to modify the examination to the extent that only qualifying marks required to obtained by these petitioners as now they are in field services and their link from study has quietly closed.

¶42

VIII) For directing the respondent authority to be extended the date of filing online application under the Advertisement No. 01010114 as the same is subject matter to this writ application and the petitioners have not applied by challenging the same.

¶43

IX) For any other relief/reliefs, for which the petitioners are entitled for.

¶44

Counsel appearing on behalf of Bihar Staff Selection Commission submitted that earlier Shambhu Prasad Singh filed MJC No. 975 of 2013 in C.W.J.C. No. 10343 of 2007 for relaxation of certain conditions of the advertisement for appointment of Amin, but a Division Bench of this Court held in LPA No. 388 of 2014 that the eligibility condition for appointment on the post of Amin shall be fixed by the State Government and this Court cannot issue any direction to specify or to fix any eligibility condition of a candidate in advertisement to fill up the vacant posts of Amin. It is the exclusive domain of the State Government to fix the eligibility of a candidate for appointment on the post of Amin and the Commission after taking the examination fill up the posts according to the condition of the eligibility of the candidates, fixed in accordance with law by the State

¶45

Patna High Court CWJC No.5023 of 2014 dt.10-10-2017 4

¶46

Government.

¶47

It appears that in view of the judgment passed in LPA No. 388 of 2014, the petitioners have lost their interest in pursuing the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed.

¶48

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶49

KKSINHA/-

¶50

AFR/NAFR	NAFR
CAV DATE	NA
UploadingDate	31.10.2017
Transmission Date	NA

Md. Adil Hussain and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Md. Adil Hussain and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dinesh Rai and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Surendra Chaudhary Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Shailesh Kumar Ojha Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Md. Islam Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Nidhi Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Shashi Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.