Petitioner challenged dismissal of appeal against order imposing deficit court fee for concealing house existence and land nature during sale deed registration. Court found concealment evident and dismissed writ petition.
Writ petition dismissed; no quashing of orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12055 of 2016
=========================================================== Nidhi Kumari W/o Vishwanath Sharma Resident of Village- Mathana alias Basua, P.S.- Aurai, District- Muzaffarpur.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
.... .... Respondent/s
=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Mukund For the Respondent/s : Mr. AAG12- Ravindra Nath Dubey
=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 10-10-2017
Heard Mr. Anil Kumar Mukund, learned counsel for the
petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Patna High Court CWJC No.12055 of 2016 dt.10-10-2017 2
Patna High Court CWJC No.12055 of 2016 dt.10-10-2017 3
there was no house constructed over the land. There is no misrepresentation of fact before the Sub-Registrar at the time of registration of the sale deed, but from perusal of the records I find that on the complaint petition a thorough enquiry was held and it was found that there was a constructed house over 1935 sqft of land purchased by the petitioner from before execution of the sale deed in favour of the petitioner and petitioner knowingly well concealed this fact and showed less value of land and also concealed about the nature of land, therefore I do not find any ground to interfere in the orders.
merit.
(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)
KKSINHA/-
| AFR/NAFR | NAFR |
|---|---|
| CAV DATE | NA |
| UploadingDate | 23.10.2017 |
| Transmission Date |
NA |
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court can interfere with the Commissioner's dismissal of an appeal against an order imposing deficit court fee for concealment of facts.
Nidhi Kumari
The State of Bihar
Prabhat Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
