Dismissed

Akhileshwar Sharma and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC28 Jan 2016CWJC/14345/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court dismissed a batch of writ petitions challenging a tribunal order denying services. The court declined to interfere with factual findings that petitioners failed to produce original certificates for verification as required by the lower authorities.

What did the court decide?

Writ application dismissed as the court is not inclined to interfere with the Tribunal's finding that original certificates were not produced.

Akhileshwar Sharma and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and… — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14345 of 2015

¶3

=========================================================== 1. Akhileshwar Sharma son of Shri Bishwanath Sharma R/o village Chaturi Punas, P.S. Ahiyapur, Distt. Muzaffarpur.

¶4

Vimala Kumari D/o Shri Badari Narayan Singh R/o Village + P.S. Bhore, Distt. Gopalganj.

¶5

Manish Kumar Shrivastava S/o Shri Uma Shankar Prasad R/o Vill - Baukat, P.O. Batavde, P.S. + P.O. - Barauli, Distt. Gopalganj.

¶6

.... .... Petitioner/s

¶7

Versus

¶8

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resource Development, Government of Bihar, Patna.

¶9

The District Teacher Appointment Appellate Tribunal, Gopalganj through its Members.

¶10

The Chairman, Nagar Panchayat Kateya, Distt. Gopalganj.

¶11

The District Education Officer, Gopalganj.

¶12

Krishna Kumar Mishra R/o Vill + P.O. Bariya, P.S. Kateya, Distt. Gopalganj.

¶13

.... .... Respondent/s

¶14

=========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vimla Kumari For the Respondent/s : Mr. Anshuman Singh- GP24

¶15

===========================================================

¶16

CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 28-01-2016

¶17

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the private-respondent.

¶18

There is a categorical finding of fact after verification of the original records, maintained by the Zila Parishad, that these petitioners did not produce the original certificates for verification on the date and time fixed. In fact, prayer and request for time with regard to submission of original documents were made and thereafter it was never done.

¶19

In absence of any unimpeachable evidence to rebut that

¶20

Patna High Court CWJC No.14345 of 2015 dt.28-01-2016

¶21

2/2

¶22

position, the Court is not inclined to interfere with the findings given by the tribunal, which is Annexure-8, dated 26^th of August, 2014.

¶23

In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, writ application is dismissed.

¶24

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)

¶25

SKM/-

¶26

Akhileshwar Sharma and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Akhileshwar Sharma and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manish Kumar Arya and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sanjay Dev Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kumkum Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Anil Kumar Sinha and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Moti Lal Singh Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Rajesh Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.