Dismissed

Kumkum Kumari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Patna HC27 Jan 2016CWJC/13273/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging contractual employment. The court held the petitioner had not been truthful due to manipulating age certificates for employment and declined to interfere.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition filed by Kumkum Kumari dismissing the writ petition. The petition for interference with the impugned order was allowed and dismissed.

Kumkum Kumari Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors. — Service and Employment | Patna HC (2016)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13273 of 2015

¶3

=========================================================== 1. Kumkum Kumari wife of Sri Bambam Shankar resident of village Manjosh, P.S. Sikandra, District Jamui .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. 2. Principal Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna. 3. Director, Department of Social Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna. 4. Additional Director, Department of Social Welfare, Munger Commissionary, Munger 5. District Programme Officer, Jamui 6. District Welfare Officer, Jamui 7. Child Development Project Officer, Sikandra, District Jamui. 8. Simpi Kumari wife of Santosh Kumar, resident of village Manjosh, P.S. Sikandra, District Jamui 9. Ranjit Singh son of Saudagar Singh, resident of village Manjosh, P.S. Sikandra, District Jamui .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr Ajay Kumar Thakur Mr. Amit Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ravish Chandra, AC to SC 16 Mr Ram Vinay Pd. Singh @ Sanjay =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 27-01-2016

¶4

Heard counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the

¶5

respondents.

¶6

Since appointment as Aaganbari Sevika is not a substantive appointment under the State but a contractual one, the Court after having gone thorough the reasons provided by the Deputy Director, Welfare, Munger Division comes to a considered opinion that the petitioner has not come clean and has been manipulating the

¶7

Patna High Court CWJC No.13273 of 2015 dt.27-01-2016

¶8

2/2

¶9

system to take advantage by using different kinds of certificates of date of birth to get one kind of employment or the other. Such conduct of this petitioner does not enthuse this Court to interfere with

¶10

Annexure- 1 in the given findings.

¶11

Writ is dismissed.

¶12

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J)

¶13

¶14

Kumkum Kumari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kumkum Kumari v. The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sikandar Ram Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Jitendra Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Kundan Kumar and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Manish Kumar Arya and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Sanjay Dev Vs The State Of Bihar and Ors.

Ram Ayodhya Pandey Vs Dr.sunil Kumar Singh and Ors.