The Patna High Court, in Cr. Misc. No.9330 of 2015, granted bail to Vimal Yadav charged under Sections 364 and 34 IPC for kidnapping, considering the favorable bail order for a co-accused.
Petitioner directed to be enlarged on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9330 of 2015 (2) dt.12-03-2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.9330 of 2015
Arising Out of PS.Case No. -129 Year- 2013 Thana -PANDARAK District- PATNA
====================================================== Vimal Yadav @ Bhimal Yadav .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prem Ranjan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Prasad Nat (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 2 12-03-2015 Heard both sides. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered under section 364/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. along with 29 other persons for kidnapping of one Chhotu Yadav, nephew of the informant. It is submitted that one of the co-accused named in the F.I.R. namely Sudhir Yadav has already been granted bail on 9-22015 vide Cr.Misc. No. 38348/14. The case of this petitioner stands on similar footing. Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner, named above, Vimal Yadav @ Bhimal Yadav is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Barh in connection with Pandarak P.S. Case
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9330 of 2015 (2) dt.12-03-2015
No. 129/2013.
(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)
Naresh/-
U
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner is entitled to bail in the kidnapping charges given that a co-accousd has already been granted bail.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Cr.Misc. No. 38348/14Referred¶5
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Vimal Yadav @ Bhimal Yadav
The State of Bihar
Prabhat Kumar Jha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
