Allowed

Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC12 Mar 2015CR. MISC./9110/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner, in custody since 06.11.2014 in a Section 420/379 IPC case, sought bail. The court granted bail, directing him to furnish a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of similar amount.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be enlarged on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate.

Ranjan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar — Cheating and Forgery | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.9110 of 2015

¶2

	Arising Out of PS.Case No. -434 Year- 2014 Thana -JAHANABAD District- JEHANABAD ====================================================== 1. Ranjan Kumar son of Ram Tabakya Sharma, Resident of Village- Salempur, P.S.- Alipur, District- Gaya
	.... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar
	.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. T.N.Thakur(App) ======================================================
	CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER
2	12-03-2015 Heard both sides.
	The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered
	under sections 420 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶3

The petitioner is not named in the first information report. The informant alleged that one persons fraudulently changed his ATM card and withdrew Rs. 2,30,000/from his account.

¶4

It is submitted that name of the petitioner figured in the case in the confessional statement of Manish Kumar @ Chotu and except the confessional statement there is no material against the petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 06.11.2014 and he was not identified in T.I.P.

¶5

Considering the facts aforesaid, the above

¶6

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9110 of 2015 (2) dt.12-03-2015

¶7

2/2

¶8

named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, in Jehanabad P.S. Case No. 434 of 2014.

¶9

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶10

M.Rahman/U T

Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ranjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sanjeet Mali Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Sarfaraj Vs The State Of Bihar

Parshuram Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar

Birendra Prasad Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar

Pramod Sahni Vs The State Of Bihar

Vimal Yadav @ Bhimal Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar