Allowed

Sanjeet Mali v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC11 Mar 2015CR. MISC./5057/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Patna High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a robbery case involving sections 392 and 376 IPC. The court noted the petitioner was named in a co-accused's confessional statement and directed his enlargement upon furnishing a bond.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to be enlarged on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties to the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City.

Sanjeet Mali Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.5057 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -12 Year- 2014 Thana -DIDARGANJ District- PATNA ====================================================== 1. Sanjeet Mali S/o Panalal Bhagat @ Panna Mali R/o Village Rustampur, P.S. Raghopur, Distt. Vaishali. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ahmad Ali(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 3 11-03-2015 Heard both sides. The petitioner seeks regular bail in a case under

¶3

section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶4

The F.I.R. is against unknown.

¶5

It is submitted that the name of the petitioner figured in the case in the confessional statement of one Pramod Kumar who was arrested in connection with Didarganj P.S. Case No. 21/14 under section 376 and other sections of the Indian Penal Code. Pramod Kumar disclosed that he along with the petitioner and others committed robbery. Sanjeet Kumar alias Lallu Kumar, whose name also figured in the confessional statement of Pramod Kumar has already been enlarged on bail by the Additional Sessions Judge 1st, Patna.

¶6

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5057 of 2015 (3) dt.11-03-2015

¶7

¶8

It appears that the name of the petitioner figured in the case in the confessional statement of Pramod Kumar. Even the motor cycle said to have been used in committing crime was recovered from in front of the house of Bishundhari Mahto, in pursuance of the confessional statement of Pramod Kumar.

¶9

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Patna City, in connection with Didarganj P.S. Case No. 12/2014.

¶10

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J)

¶11

Amin/-

¶12

Sanjeet Mali v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sanjeet Mali v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Suraj Dildar Vs The State Of Bihar

Madhuwendra Rai@Madhuwendra Kumar Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Mithilesh Paswan Vs The State Of Bihar

Gyan Prakash Vs The State Of Bihar

Md. Sarfaraj Vs The State Of Bihar

Parshuram Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar