Allowed

Nandu Paswan and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC15 Dec 2015CR. MISC./52192/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a bail petition in a criminal case involving the alleged burning of a jhopri constructed on a Hanuman statue. The High Court allowed bail on the condition of furnishing a bond with sureties and appearing personally at the trial, with a stipulation for cancellation if absent on two consecutive dates.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount with conditions of personal appearance and cancellation upon default on two consecutive dates.

Nandu Paswan and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

¶2

Criminal Miscellaneous No.52192 of 2015

¶3

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -128 Year- 2015 Thana -EKANGARSARAI District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ====================================================== 1. Nandu Paswan S/o Thanu Paswan 2. Ajay Paswan 3. Brijnandan Paswan Both Sons of Baleshwar Paswan All R/o village Mojahid Pur, P.S. Ekangar Sarai, Dist. Nalanda .... .... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rewti Kant Raman For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bisheshwar Ram(App) CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER 2 15-12-2015 Heard counsel for the petitioners and Mr. Ram Chandra Singh APP for the State. The three petitioners along with others have been cited as accuseds in Ekangar Sarai P.S. Case No. 128 of 2015 initially registered under section 435 & subsequently section 436 IPC was added. The allegation is that a statue of Hanuman was pitch/installed and a Jhopri was put up thereon. The accused persons put the said Jhopri on fire.

¶4

The contention of the petitioner is that even according to the FIR the Jhopri was not for human dwelling. Earlier to this the petitioner had lodged a case against the present prosecution side for forcible possession of the land and in connection

¶5

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52192 of 2015 (2) dt.15-12-2015

¶6

2/2

¶7

therewith several proceeding under Cr. P.C. were going on. The petitioners are in custody since 25.08.2015.

¶8

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners above named are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction learned ACJM, Hilasa (Nalanda) in Ekangar Sarai P.S. case No. 128 of 2015 on conditions that one of the bailors shall be their own/close family members. In the event of framing of charge, the petitioners shall appear in person on each date fixed at the trial. In case of default in appearance on two consecutive dates, the trial court shall cancel their bail bonds.

¶9

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)

¶10

HR/-

¶11

U T

Nandu Paswan and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nandu Paswan and Ors. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Avinash Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Prem Kumar Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Molajim Khan Vs The State Of Bihar

Sonu Yadav @ Vikram Vs The State Of Bihar

Chandan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Sheo Jee Paswan and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar