Allowed

Sheo Jee Paswan and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC15 Dec 2015CR. MISC./51982/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to two petitioners in a case involving a dispute over a transformer replacement which led to a fight and property damage. The court fixed bail conditions and required the appointment of sureties.

What did the court decide?

Direction to release the petitioners on bail by furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 each with two sureties of the like amount to the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Madhubani.

Sheo Jee Paswan and Anr. Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.51982 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -224 Year- 2015 Thana -BISFI District- MADHUBANI ====================================================== 1. Sheo Jee Paswan Son of Late Anand Paswan @ Rama Nand Paswan, 2. Jhagaru Paswan, son of Ramji Paswan, Both residents of village- Anjauli, P.S.- Bisfi (Patauna), DistrictMadhubani. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bijay Bhushan Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ahmad Ali (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KISHORE KUMAR MANDAL ORAL ORDER

¶3

2 15-12-2015 Heard the Counsel for the petitioners and the counsel for the informant.

¶4

Two petitioners herein seek bail in Bisfi (Patuana) P.S. Case No. 224 of 2015 registered under Section 436 and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code.

¶5

On a trivial issue i.e. replacement of burnt transformer, it appears, two groups fought against each other. The allegation is that subsequently other villagers of the village of the petitioners assembled and there was brick batting and one hut was put on fire.

¶6

Counsel for the petitioners states that the allegation of putting the hut on fire is not attributed to the petitioners who are in custody since 8.9.2015. There is a counter version of the motive which is alleged in the F.I.R. lodged by the present accused party

¶7

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51982 of 2015 (2) dt.15-12-2015

¶8

2/2

¶9

(Annexure-3). The petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Relevant statement in this regard is made in paragraph no. 3.

¶10

Counsel for the informant has, however, submitted that there is one criminal case pending against petitioner no. 2 which has not been stated in the present case.

¶11

Having considered the submissions of the parties, the petitioners abovenamed are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Madhubani in Bisfi (Patauna) P.S. Case No. 224 of 2015 subject to the following conditions:

¶12

(i) One of the bailers shall be the own/close family members of the petitioners.

¶13

(ii) In case of framing of charge, the petitioners shall appear in person on each and every date fixed in the Court below. In case of default in doing so on two consecutive occasions without any cogent/satisfactory reason, the Trial Court shall have liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioners and secure their arrest in accordance with law.

¶14

(Kishore Kumar Mandal, J)

¶15

Pankaj/U T

Sheo Jee Paswan and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sheo Jee Paswan and Anr. v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Avinash Rai Vs The State Of Bihar

Prem Kumar Singh Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Molajim Khan Vs The State Of Bihar

Nandu Paswan and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Sonu Yadav @ Vikram Vs The State Of Bihar

Chandan Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar