Allowed

Jatu Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

Patna HC21 May 2015CR. MISC./12934/2015

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Sudhir Singh, J., granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in an excise case involving recovery of illicit liquor. The petitioner was directed to deposit Rs. 20,000/- in the lower court and furnish a bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties if arrested or surrenders within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to deposit Rs. 20,000/-; upon arrest or surrender within 8 weeks, released on bail with bond of Rs. 10,000/ and two sureties.

Jatu Mahto Vs The State Of Bihar — Bail and Remand | Patna HC (2015)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Criminal Miscellaneous No.12934 of 2015

¶2

Arising Out of PS.Case No. -37 Year- 2014 Thana -GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. DistrictSARAN ====================================================== 1. Jatu Mahto S/o Late Satya Narayan Mahto R/o Village Saraiya, P.S. Baniyapur, District Saran. .... .... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manish Chandra Gandhi, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pushpa Sinha(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER

¶3

2 21-05-2015 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Excise Case No. 37 of 2014 for the offence under Section 47(a) of the Excise Act.

¶4

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

¶5

The prosecution story, in brief, is that this is a case of recovery and seizure of 54 liters country made illicit liquor from the house of the petitioner.

¶6

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has not been apprehended on the spot. Further, it has been submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The petitioner has further submitted that he shall deposit an amount of Rs. 20,000/- in the leaned court below which may be subject to the final disposal of the case.

¶7

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12934 of 2015 (2) dt.21-05-2015

¶8

¶9

On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the First Information Report.

¶10

Considering the aforesaid facts that the petitioner is directed to deposit an amount of Rs. 20,000/- in the leaned court below which shall be subject to the final disposal of the case, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within a period of eight weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Saran at Chapra in connection with Excise Case No. 37 of 2014 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C.

¶11

(Sudhir Singh, J)

¶12

P.K./-

¶13

U T

Jatu Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jatu Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Amit Prasad @ Amit Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Niranjan Singh @ Niraj Kumar Singh Vs The State Of Bihar

Kallu Kumar Vs The State Of Bihar

Akhilesh Jha @ Akhilesh Kumar Jha Vs State Of Bihar and Anr.

Birendra Sahni and Ors. Vs The State Of Bihar

Bhuvneshwar Yadav Vs The State Of Bihar